The inner and the outer worlds are reflections of each other. Similar to the outer world, the inner world is a society crowded with many small selves. The inner male and the inner female, the purpose driven mind and the loving heart...the Yin and the Yang of our fragmented selves. For many, the inner polarities are felt as opposing forces, that fragment and destroy oneself. For some this inner war becomes so violent, that it drives them insane. However, with awareness and meditation, the inner polarities start recognizing, and then slowly supporting and loving each other. As the inner male starts loving the inner female, and the inner female starts loving the inner male, an immense freedom arises within oneself. This spiritual alchemy, the sacred union within, gives birth to the Big Self.
The small self loves by filling its emptiness.
The big self loves by sharing its fullness.
Saturday, February 16, 2008
Sunday, May 20, 2007
The Game of Love and Freedom
Most people understand only two types of games. Games in which competition wins, and games in which cooperation wins.
The more gross games of life on the lower levels of maslow hierarcy are best played with the spirit of competition in which free markets do well. The subtle games of life on the higher levels of maslow hierarcy are best played with the spirit of love in which cooperation wins.
But games dont have to be divided only between cooperative and non-coopearative game theory models.
By allowing "multi-dimensional utilities," one can play a third type of game in which cooperation results endogenoulsy even from non-cooperative game theory. This game encourages both love and freedom.
Communism is a game in which "love" is forced by the method of cooperative game theory. Capitalism is a game in which "freedom" is sold to individuals with unidimensional utilities using non-cooperative game theory. Since love can never be forced, and unidimensional utilities are unreal, neither system has brought lasting peace and well-being to humankind.
Allowing the third type of game using non-cooperative game theory with multidimensional utilities allows freedom and love to co-exist. In this game one loves out of one's freedom, and feels free because one is loved.
Sooner or later humanity has to shift to the third type of game. This game is a lot of fun, as games were meant to be!
The more gross games of life on the lower levels of maslow hierarcy are best played with the spirit of competition in which free markets do well. The subtle games of life on the higher levels of maslow hierarcy are best played with the spirit of love in which cooperation wins.
But games dont have to be divided only between cooperative and non-coopearative game theory models.
By allowing "multi-dimensional utilities," one can play a third type of game in which cooperation results endogenoulsy even from non-cooperative game theory. This game encourages both love and freedom.
Communism is a game in which "love" is forced by the method of cooperative game theory. Capitalism is a game in which "freedom" is sold to individuals with unidimensional utilities using non-cooperative game theory. Since love can never be forced, and unidimensional utilities are unreal, neither system has brought lasting peace and well-being to humankind.
Allowing the third type of game using non-cooperative game theory with multidimensional utilities allows freedom and love to co-exist. In this game one loves out of one's freedom, and feels free because one is loved.
Sooner or later humanity has to shift to the third type of game. This game is a lot of fun, as games were meant to be!
Saturday, April 21, 2007
Poverty of the Soul
At a Hindu ceremony held on April 19th, on the Virginia Tech campus, 33 candles were lighted, including one for Mr. Cho, who shot himself after his deadly killing spree.
“He also was a lost soul,” said Kusum Singh, who helped organize the Hindu ceremony to memorialize G. V. Loganathan, 52, a professor of civil and environmental engineering, and Minal Panchal, 26, an architecture student from Mumbai, India.
Is it simply the lack of love and belongingness that allows extreme psychological poverty to arise in some cases, which leads to crimes such as murders and mass killings? Do happy and loving people ever go on a killing spree? Extreme psychological poverty exists in all nations - and perhaps even more so in richer nations, as they get obsessed with material well-being.
“He also was a lost soul,” said Kusum Singh, who helped organize the Hindu ceremony to memorialize G. V. Loganathan, 52, a professor of civil and environmental engineering, and Minal Panchal, 26, an architecture student from Mumbai, India.
Is it simply the lack of love and belongingness that allows extreme psychological poverty to arise in some cases, which leads to crimes such as murders and mass killings? Do happy and loving people ever go on a killing spree? Extreme psychological poverty exists in all nations - and perhaps even more so in richer nations, as they get obsessed with material well-being.
Sunday, April 01, 2007
The End of Poverty
In contrast to the failed small-self "structural adjustment" economic programmes of the World Bank and the IMF, Jeffrey D. Sachs offers a new paradigm of Clinical Economics based on his work in Bolivia, Poland, India, China, and Africa. In his book, The End of Poverty, he offers big-self solutions to the interwoven economic, political, environmental, and social problems that affect the world's poorest nations. This book is one of my all time favorites.
In April 2004, and again in April 2005, Professor Sachs was named as one of the 100 most influential people in the world by Time.
In April 2004, and again in April 2005, Professor Sachs was named as one of the 100 most influential people in the world by Time.
Sunday, March 18, 2007
The Other Omar
He who knows not, and knows not he knows not, is a fool...shun him.
He who knows not, and knows he knows not, is a child...teach him.
He who knows, and knows not he knows, is asleep...wake him.
He who knows, and knows he knows, is wise...follow him
Omar Khayyam, Philosopher
Here is my exposition of the wisdom of Omar Khayyam, the great mathematician, astronomer, philosopher, writer, and a poet from the 11th century Persia, especially applicable in these times of insane rulers and warmongers.
1. Fool. Fools have either been not exposed to the world so they are innocently foolish, like a 3-year old child who burns himself by climbing on to a burning stove, or they are people with petty egos or small selves. Once the small-self shell becomes hard, it is hard to penetrate the shell. Then the small self lives in its own world, and has no clue about what others think of the self or how others think of the world. Most fundamentalists living in different parts of the world from Afghanistan and Iraq, to the deep red states of America, are either innocently foolish and/or are trapped in their small selves. They don't know that they don't know.
2. Child/Student. How does a child/student come to "know" that he does not know? Lets say a child puts his finger on a burning stove, but for some reason the finger either does not burn (the child is gifted), or the finger burns, but the child experiences no pain (e.g., some problems with nerves). In either case, the child does not learn that a burning stove can hurt. The child does not know that he "does not know." But if the child had experienced some pain, he would have come to know that his knowledge of burning stoves was incorrect. So life is a great teacher and experiencing life in a normal manner allows one to become a student, both humble and aware. But what if one could not experience life in a normal manner? What if one grew up like George W., and didn’t have to pay for the mistakes made in one's younger years? Then one would lose the opportunity to transform oneself from a fool to a student.
3. Asleep. As a student, one accumulates much knowledge. But now the danger is that one may fall asleep with that knowledge. One may no longer remember that one knows. This happens to people, who after graduating from school don't use much of what they learnt. One has to actively apply one's knowledge either consciously or subconsciously to not fall asleep. Also, some basic instinctual knowledge is simply wired in our brains, but still some encouragement is needed for its fuller development. One may also be born with some innate talents, but restrictive economic/political systems, authoritarian upbringing etc., can prevent these talents from coming out. In this respect, the free market system in America with much focus on individual freedom allows the talents of some of the population to be realized. There are many talented people "asleep" in other nations ravaged by war, poverty, dictatorships, communism, and other authoritarian regimes. We need to have a foreign policy that empowers the moderates around the world including in nations like Cuba and North Korea for these talented people to wake up. That is our biggest hope for transforming these nations from the inside, like we transformed China with Nixon's policies.
Finally, many accomplished people in science, business, media, and politics tend to fall asleep. For example, many reporters and editors of the mainstream media are simply asleep. They learnt a lot in their schools, but have satisfied themselves by reporting and writing just to make money without going after the most accurate and important stories, which require much effort and integrity. Similarly, many orthodox medical practitioners (not the researchers) are asleep. Doctors hardly read new research on a regular basis and often prescribe "new" drugs based on the sales pitch of the pharma representatives. Then, after side effects or injuries are revealed, they switch to prescribing the next brand of profitable/patentable drugs.
4. Wise. Few in this world are wise. One has to go through all other stages of being a fool, a student, asleep, and perhaps then wisdom dawns. Being wise is a continuous process, one has to be continuously aware of the whole process of life. Simply playing out one's small self-drama does not allow one to be wise. Having intense awareness about life at many levels, both from within and without, allows one to be wise. And, its not just the awareness about the observed world, but also the observation of the "observer," that allows wisdom to get rooted. And, much wisdom simply comes from experience, and making peace with one's own life. Interestingly, many fools think that they are wise. This is because when you do not know that you do not know, then it is much easier to fall in the trap of thinking that you know that you know.
He who knows not, and knows he knows not, is a child...teach him.
He who knows, and knows not he knows, is asleep...wake him.
He who knows, and knows he knows, is wise...follow him
Omar Khayyam, Philosopher
Here is my exposition of the wisdom of Omar Khayyam, the great mathematician, astronomer, philosopher, writer, and a poet from the 11th century Persia, especially applicable in these times of insane rulers and warmongers.
1. Fool. Fools have either been not exposed to the world so they are innocently foolish, like a 3-year old child who burns himself by climbing on to a burning stove, or they are people with petty egos or small selves. Once the small-self shell becomes hard, it is hard to penetrate the shell. Then the small self lives in its own world, and has no clue about what others think of the self or how others think of the world. Most fundamentalists living in different parts of the world from Afghanistan and Iraq, to the deep red states of America, are either innocently foolish and/or are trapped in their small selves. They don't know that they don't know.
2. Child/Student. How does a child/student come to "know" that he does not know? Lets say a child puts his finger on a burning stove, but for some reason the finger either does not burn (the child is gifted), or the finger burns, but the child experiences no pain (e.g., some problems with nerves). In either case, the child does not learn that a burning stove can hurt. The child does not know that he "does not know." But if the child had experienced some pain, he would have come to know that his knowledge of burning stoves was incorrect. So life is a great teacher and experiencing life in a normal manner allows one to become a student, both humble and aware. But what if one could not experience life in a normal manner? What if one grew up like George W., and didn’t have to pay for the mistakes made in one's younger years? Then one would lose the opportunity to transform oneself from a fool to a student.
3. Asleep. As a student, one accumulates much knowledge. But now the danger is that one may fall asleep with that knowledge. One may no longer remember that one knows. This happens to people, who after graduating from school don't use much of what they learnt. One has to actively apply one's knowledge either consciously or subconsciously to not fall asleep. Also, some basic instinctual knowledge is simply wired in our brains, but still some encouragement is needed for its fuller development. One may also be born with some innate talents, but restrictive economic/political systems, authoritarian upbringing etc., can prevent these talents from coming out. In this respect, the free market system in America with much focus on individual freedom allows the talents of some of the population to be realized. There are many talented people "asleep" in other nations ravaged by war, poverty, dictatorships, communism, and other authoritarian regimes. We need to have a foreign policy that empowers the moderates around the world including in nations like Cuba and North Korea for these talented people to wake up. That is our biggest hope for transforming these nations from the inside, like we transformed China with Nixon's policies.
Finally, many accomplished people in science, business, media, and politics tend to fall asleep. For example, many reporters and editors of the mainstream media are simply asleep. They learnt a lot in their schools, but have satisfied themselves by reporting and writing just to make money without going after the most accurate and important stories, which require much effort and integrity. Similarly, many orthodox medical practitioners (not the researchers) are asleep. Doctors hardly read new research on a regular basis and often prescribe "new" drugs based on the sales pitch of the pharma representatives. Then, after side effects or injuries are revealed, they switch to prescribing the next brand of profitable/patentable drugs.
4. Wise. Few in this world are wise. One has to go through all other stages of being a fool, a student, asleep, and perhaps then wisdom dawns. Being wise is a continuous process, one has to be continuously aware of the whole process of life. Simply playing out one's small self-drama does not allow one to be wise. Having intense awareness about life at many levels, both from within and without, allows one to be wise. And, its not just the awareness about the observed world, but also the observation of the "observer," that allows wisdom to get rooted. And, much wisdom simply comes from experience, and making peace with one's own life. Interestingly, many fools think that they are wise. This is because when you do not know that you do not know, then it is much easier to fall in the trap of thinking that you know that you know.
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
Campaign for a Violence-Free Stress-Free America
The Art of Living Foundation celebrates its 25th anniversary gala on March 28 at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, to highlight the critical role human values play in the eradication of violence and stress. The event is a platform for prominent leaders and decision makers in the fields of politics, business and civil society to draw attention to what leaders and ordinary citizens can do together to achieve a Violence-Free, Stress-Free America.
Thursday, December 21, 2006
Vacation for the Soul
Looking for an exotic and affordable vacation? Indulge your body and soul living in an open Casita in the tropical hills close to a virgin beach with the most amazing and beautiful people from around the world. Try soccer, yoga, cleansing, meditation, delicious raw foods, silent retreats, massage, dancing, horse riding, swimming, loving, and living in a magical place called...
Pachamama
Pachamama
Wednesday, December 20, 2006
Transformation by Death
Death comes in many forms, a divorce, losing a family member, an insult by someone, or living with a disease. Can one die to the past moment by moment, so that every new moment is fresh and alive? Learning to die gracefully, without fear, without emptiness, without hatred, and without anger is the quickest way to discover the big Self.
How to Change the World?
Spiritualize Politics, Socialize Business, and Secularize Religion
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, Humanitarian
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, Humanitarian
Truth is a Pathless Land
Truth is a pathless land. Man cannot come to it through any organization, through any creed, through any dogma, priest or ritual, not through any philosophic knowledge or psychological technique. He has to find it through the mirror of relationship, through the understanding of the contents of his own mind through observation and not through intellectual analysis or introspective dissection
Man has built in himself images as a fence of security - religious, political, personal. These manifest as symbols, ideas, beliefs. The burden of these images dominates man's thinking, his relationships, and his daily life. These images are the causes of our problems, for they divide man from man. His perception of life is shaped by the concepts already established in his mind. The content of his consciousness is his entire existence. This content is common to all humanity
J. Krishnamurti, Philosopher
.
Man has built in himself images as a fence of security - religious, political, personal. These manifest as symbols, ideas, beliefs. The burden of these images dominates man's thinking, his relationships, and his daily life. These images are the causes of our problems, for they divide man from man. His perception of life is shaped by the concepts already established in his mind. The content of his consciousness is his entire existence. This content is common to all humanity
J. Krishnamurti, Philosopher
.
Tuesday, November 28, 2006
Expressing the Infinite
A language possesses utility only insofar as it can construct conventional boundaries. A language of no boundaries is no language at all, and thus the mystic who tries to speak logically and formally of unity consciousness is doomed to sound very paradoxical or contradictory. The problem is that the structure of any language cannot grasp the nature of unity consciousness, any more than a fork could grasp the ocean.
Ken Wilber, Philosopher
.
Ken Wilber, Philosopher
.
Metaphysics of the Infinite
Zero and the infinite are two sides of the same coin. The utlimate reality includes all, and is made up of nothing. Enlightenment is finite disolving into the infinite, either by becoming nothing or by becoming everything.
Small self belongs to the finite. No self belongs to the infinite.
So how can one reach the infinite?
There are two paths. One can become smaller and smaller and simply disappear into nothingness. This is the approach of Zen, which through insight negates all identification in order to experience the ultimate nothingness or nirvana.
Or one can expand oneself and become bigger and bigger, until one loses all identification with anything smaller than the infinite. This is the approach of christianity, which through love can make one infinite and experience I AM everywhere.
Small self belongs to the finite. No self belongs to the infinite.
So how can one reach the infinite?
There are two paths. One can become smaller and smaller and simply disappear into nothingness. This is the approach of Zen, which through insight negates all identification in order to experience the ultimate nothingness or nirvana.
Or one can expand oneself and become bigger and bigger, until one loses all identification with anything smaller than the infinite. This is the approach of christianity, which through love can make one infinite and experience I AM everywhere.
Tuesday, November 14, 2006
Mathematics of GOD
The mathematics of GOD is based upon three premises.
Premise 1: Existence is Infinite
Premise 2: The total Joy and Pain in existence are equal and opposite
Premise 3: GOD experiences infinite joy
Let the word Joy signify all positive states of being (like love, happiness, bliss, etc.), and the word Pain signify all negative states of being (like fear, anxiety, suffering, etc.). Under the above three premises, consider two types of existences.
Under existence A, God and Devil exist as equal and opposite. Though, both are infinite, God experiences infinite joy, and Devil experience infinite pain. However, such an existence would be devoid of any compassion for the devil, who would suffer eternally.
Under existence B, the infinite universe is made up of time, space, and other dimensions, in which joy and pain are distributed across infinite living beings (bacteria, plants, animals, humans, etc.) over infinite time and space. Each of these living beings experiences finite amounts of joy and pain.
Under existence B, all living beings, except GOD, on avearge experience x units of joy and x + e units of pain, where e is a very small number close to zero. For example x = 100, and e = 0.00001. Since 100 is almost the same as 100.00001, living beings on average experience almost the same amount of joy and pain. Without experiencing the pain, they could not know joy (premise 2, above), so they don't mind experiencing both in almost equal amounts.
Since the universe has infinite living beings, and since each living being on average has a deficit of e, representing a little extra pain over joy, GOD must experience infinite joy to balance out the infinite pain resulting from the product of e and infinity. This makes premise 3 consistent with premises 1 and 2, and yet no single living being experiences infinite pain under existence B.
This is the magic of GOD's mathematics. It explains how the infinite joy consciousness of GOD is created from a finite joy/pain consciousness of living beings. Under existence B, there cannot be a hell of eternal suffering (Christianity is wrong about this), as it is not needed for the existence of GOD.
Finally, as mentioned in many spiritual traditions, the inifnite living beings can get enlightened and merge into GOD.
The consciousness of the infinite living beings separated from GOD to allow the game of joy and pain.
Since, we are all GOD separated from itself, we go back to GOD, upon our enlightenment.
We as finite beings are necessary for the infinite GOD to be.
Premise 1: Existence is Infinite
Premise 2: The total Joy and Pain in existence are equal and opposite
Premise 3: GOD experiences infinite joy
Let the word Joy signify all positive states of being (like love, happiness, bliss, etc.), and the word Pain signify all negative states of being (like fear, anxiety, suffering, etc.). Under the above three premises, consider two types of existences.
Under existence A, God and Devil exist as equal and opposite. Though, both are infinite, God experiences infinite joy, and Devil experience infinite pain. However, such an existence would be devoid of any compassion for the devil, who would suffer eternally.
Under existence B, the infinite universe is made up of time, space, and other dimensions, in which joy and pain are distributed across infinite living beings (bacteria, plants, animals, humans, etc.) over infinite time and space. Each of these living beings experiences finite amounts of joy and pain.
Under existence B, all living beings, except GOD, on avearge experience x units of joy and x + e units of pain, where e is a very small number close to zero. For example x = 100, and e = 0.00001. Since 100 is almost the same as 100.00001, living beings on average experience almost the same amount of joy and pain. Without experiencing the pain, they could not know joy (premise 2, above), so they don't mind experiencing both in almost equal amounts.
Since the universe has infinite living beings, and since each living being on average has a deficit of e, representing a little extra pain over joy, GOD must experience infinite joy to balance out the infinite pain resulting from the product of e and infinity. This makes premise 3 consistent with premises 1 and 2, and yet no single living being experiences infinite pain under existence B.
This is the magic of GOD's mathematics. It explains how the infinite joy consciousness of GOD is created from a finite joy/pain consciousness of living beings. Under existence B, there cannot be a hell of eternal suffering (Christianity is wrong about this), as it is not needed for the existence of GOD.
Finally, as mentioned in many spiritual traditions, the inifnite living beings can get enlightened and merge into GOD.
The consciousness of the infinite living beings separated from GOD to allow the game of joy and pain.
Since, we are all GOD separated from itself, we go back to GOD, upon our enlightenment.
We as finite beings are necessary for the infinite GOD to be.
Tuesday, October 31, 2006
Big-Self Capitalism
The poem I wrote in the previous post captures the essential reality of all great civilizations, from Hindu (the “untouchables” suffer even now after three thousand years), Egyptian, Persian, Greek, Roman, Mogul, to the modern European/American. Each and every civilization was built using the blood and sweat of the lesser human beings. Modern nations and modern economic systems evolved from this broad human reality. The original cause behind the fatal attraction of the proletariat to communism was centuries of exploitation by feudalism and capitalism. Communism was simply a revolt by the masses. Like any revenge of the mobs, it was a release of anger, hate, and insanity by big parts of humanity. And, of course, revenge is often crueler than the exploitation that causes it. Science, communication, and weapons made it possible for the proletariat and the insane rulers in their “name” to kill twenty million in Soviet Russia, sixty million in China, and few more millions in other countries. Trying to achieve the impossible task of making all human achievements equal, communism led to the repression of all freedoms, economic, social, and spiritual.
In contrast, free-market capitalism worked well in spreading democratic values and general uplifting of the living standards of many people, though many were exploited and left behind. Two essential instruments of capitalism were innovation and exploitation. Historically, exploitation was not only its main instrument, but was often used as the bow that shot the arrow of innovation. Some men could think because others toiled in slave labor. The biggest exploiting groups gave birth to the greatest innovators. This continues even today, may be in more subtle forms, even though after FDR’s New Deal and advancements in technology, there was hope that innovation would replace exploitation as the main instrument of capitalism. Curiously, libertarians such as the famed economists Ludwig von Mises, Milton Friedman, and the pop philosopher Ayn Rand spent their whole lives preoccupied with the instrument of innovation, never acknowledging seriously the instrument of exploitation in the success of early capitalism.
The interaction of innovation and exploitation creates three forms of capitalism. Small-self capitalism, which increases efficiency mostly by exploitation (of workers, customers, and the environment). Modern capitalism which increases efficiency using both innovation and exploitation. And, big-self capitalism which increases efficiency mostly by innovation. The influence of money on government is highest in the stage of small-self capitalism, and lowest or non-existent in the stage of big-self capitalism. Only a complete elimination of the influence of money on law-makers can guarantee that laws against exploitation can be effectively passed without being blocked by the exploiters. In the 20th century, the western countries moved from small-self capitalism to modern capitalism. The big question confronting most industrialized nations today is whether we can move from modern capitalism to big-self capitalism in the 21st century?
In contrast, free-market capitalism worked well in spreading democratic values and general uplifting of the living standards of many people, though many were exploited and left behind. Two essential instruments of capitalism were innovation and exploitation. Historically, exploitation was not only its main instrument, but was often used as the bow that shot the arrow of innovation. Some men could think because others toiled in slave labor. The biggest exploiting groups gave birth to the greatest innovators. This continues even today, may be in more subtle forms, even though after FDR’s New Deal and advancements in technology, there was hope that innovation would replace exploitation as the main instrument of capitalism. Curiously, libertarians such as the famed economists Ludwig von Mises, Milton Friedman, and the pop philosopher Ayn Rand spent their whole lives preoccupied with the instrument of innovation, never acknowledging seriously the instrument of exploitation in the success of early capitalism.
The interaction of innovation and exploitation creates three forms of capitalism. Small-self capitalism, which increases efficiency mostly by exploitation (of workers, customers, and the environment). Modern capitalism which increases efficiency using both innovation and exploitation. And, big-self capitalism which increases efficiency mostly by innovation. The influence of money on government is highest in the stage of small-self capitalism, and lowest or non-existent in the stage of big-self capitalism. Only a complete elimination of the influence of money on law-makers can guarantee that laws against exploitation can be effectively passed without being blocked by the exploiters. In the 20th century, the western countries moved from small-self capitalism to modern capitalism. The big question confronting most industrialized nations today is whether we can move from modern capitalism to big-self capitalism in the 21st century?
Sunday, October 15, 2006
Wounds and Scars
Once upon a time lived two tribes
The men of first tribe were unhappy and evil
The men of second tribe were happy and noble
One day the evil struck the noble
Took over their land
Raped their wives
And enslaved their men
The happy tribesmen now worked twelve-hour days
Under the threats of hunger, fear, and pain
The physically strong were kept alive with food and shelter
The weak ones abandoned without any care
The unhappy tribesmen were freed of bodily labor
They could now pursue thinking and contemplation
To the unhappy tribe were born the children of privilege
To the happy tribe were born the children of misfortune
Over time these children bore more children
The bodies and minds of the two tribes adapted to their new roles
Institutions developed to help strengthen the new realities
Both tribes forgetting how they came to be
The children of the unhappy tribe had minds full of wonder
The children of the happy tribe had hearts heavily burdened
The children of the unhappy tribe created science and technology
The children of the happy tribe watched with envy
The children of the unhappy tribe celebrated life
The children of the happy tribe feared for their lives
Centuries later children of the unhappy tribe discovered
The many injustices of their ancestors
Their hearts filled up with undeserved emotions
Of sadness, remorse, guilt, and anger
They freed the children of the happy tribe
And shared with them a piece of their pie
But their acceptance came from a heart of contrition
Not a heart flowing with love and benediction
The children of the happy tribe wanted affection
Not the pity arising from the historical infraction
Though their wounds were beginning to heal
They could not see blinded by the scars
Some children of the unhappy tribe saw the scars
Quickly announced that sharing of pie created scars
So the children of the happy tribe were abandoned
With their partially healed wounds and their visible scars
The men of first tribe were unhappy and evil
The men of second tribe were happy and noble
One day the evil struck the noble
Took over their land
Raped their wives
And enslaved their men
The happy tribesmen now worked twelve-hour days
Under the threats of hunger, fear, and pain
The physically strong were kept alive with food and shelter
The weak ones abandoned without any care
The unhappy tribesmen were freed of bodily labor
They could now pursue thinking and contemplation
To the unhappy tribe were born the children of privilege
To the happy tribe were born the children of misfortune
Over time these children bore more children
The bodies and minds of the two tribes adapted to their new roles
Institutions developed to help strengthen the new realities
Both tribes forgetting how they came to be
The children of the unhappy tribe had minds full of wonder
The children of the happy tribe had hearts heavily burdened
The children of the unhappy tribe created science and technology
The children of the happy tribe watched with envy
The children of the unhappy tribe celebrated life
The children of the happy tribe feared for their lives
Centuries later children of the unhappy tribe discovered
The many injustices of their ancestors
Their hearts filled up with undeserved emotions
Of sadness, remorse, guilt, and anger
They freed the children of the happy tribe
And shared with them a piece of their pie
But their acceptance came from a heart of contrition
Not a heart flowing with love and benediction
The children of the happy tribe wanted affection
Not the pity arising from the historical infraction
Though their wounds were beginning to heal
They could not see blinded by the scars
Some children of the unhappy tribe saw the scars
Quickly announced that sharing of pie created scars
So the children of the happy tribe were abandoned
With their partially healed wounds and their visible scars
Tuesday, October 03, 2006
The Intellectual and the Wise
An intellectual circles around and around to prove a premise hidden in the emotional middle brain.
The intellectual is very skilled at hiding the "emotional" origins of the premise, not only from others, but even from himself, by using logical arguments of the upper brain.
The premise invariably is rooted in some small-self identity of the intellectual (i.e., American, conservative, liberal, etc.).
But how long can one move in circles? Five years, ten years, fifty years? Whole life?
A wise person quits circling around, and moves inward, towards the very center of the circle, right into the middle brain.
The wise one sees the small self.
In that seeing both the small self and the premise lose their grip.
Meditation is seeing directly into one's middle brain, with a silent upper brain. It is the journey of a small self into the big self, a transformation of the intellectual into the wise.
The intellectual is very skilled at hiding the "emotional" origins of the premise, not only from others, but even from himself, by using logical arguments of the upper brain.
The premise invariably is rooted in some small-self identity of the intellectual (i.e., American, conservative, liberal, etc.).
But how long can one move in circles? Five years, ten years, fifty years? Whole life?
A wise person quits circling around, and moves inward, towards the very center of the circle, right into the middle brain.
The wise one sees the small self.
In that seeing both the small self and the premise lose their grip.
Meditation is seeing directly into one's middle brain, with a silent upper brain. It is the journey of a small self into the big self, a transformation of the intellectual into the wise.
Monday, October 02, 2006
Living 100%
A divided Self consists of many small selves pulling the consciousness in opposing directions. The consciousness of a divided self may range from simple indecisiveness, to chronic procrastination, to paranoid schizophrenia.
Insanity is total separation of small selves. Self-actualization is total integration of small selves. A self-actualized human being is fully integrated in body, mind, and spirit. Such a being lives 100% moment by moment.
The small selves must be loved unconditionally for them to die and merge into the big Self. For example, the gluttonous over-eating self must be loved unconditionally for a compulsive eater to go beyond the guilt of overeating and thus, attaining freedom from addiction to food. The guilt of eating too much keeps one trapped in eating without awareness. By enjoying food 100%, eating slowly with full awareness of the taste buds, allows one to eat less. This applies to all mental addictions from food and love to money and career. Enjoying life 100% is the easiest way to find the balance and harmony that is beyond the grasp of small selves, but is the very nature of the big Self. Loving a small self unconditionally and totally is the way to allow the small self to merge into the big Self. Conscious death of the small selves is the birthing of the big Self. Loving every single small self within, deeply and unconditionally, however bad, ugly, evil, unworthy, the small self may seem, is the quickest path to big Self-realization.
Only a big Self can live life 100%
Insanity is total separation of small selves. Self-actualization is total integration of small selves. A self-actualized human being is fully integrated in body, mind, and spirit. Such a being lives 100% moment by moment.
The small selves must be loved unconditionally for them to die and merge into the big Self. For example, the gluttonous over-eating self must be loved unconditionally for a compulsive eater to go beyond the guilt of overeating and thus, attaining freedom from addiction to food. The guilt of eating too much keeps one trapped in eating without awareness. By enjoying food 100%, eating slowly with full awareness of the taste buds, allows one to eat less. This applies to all mental addictions from food and love to money and career. Enjoying life 100% is the easiest way to find the balance and harmony that is beyond the grasp of small selves, but is the very nature of the big Self. Loving a small self unconditionally and totally is the way to allow the small self to merge into the big Self. Conscious death of the small selves is the birthing of the big Self. Loving every single small self within, deeply and unconditionally, however bad, ugly, evil, unworthy, the small self may seem, is the quickest path to big Self-realization.
Only a big Self can live life 100%
Tuesday, September 26, 2006
YEEEESSSSSSSS!
Curious about Self-journey? Here is your chance to go deeper. A dynamic international teacher will lead a 26-hour workshop on body/mind techniques that help in stress reduction, increase awareness, and see your....Self like never before.
http://www.myspace.com/jointherhythm
http://www.myspace.com/jointherhythm
Sunday, September 24, 2006
Einstein's Advice for George W. Bush
Any fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius-and a lot of courage-to move in the opposite direction.
Albert Einstein
Albert Einstein
Saturday, September 23, 2006
Global Warming: The Scientists versus the Conservatives
Global warming is an important but confusing issue for most people because this issue has economic significance, but perhaps not as much statistical significance. Conservatives claim that statistical significance of the relationship between human action and global warming cannot be demonstrated. Much of the scientific establishment opposes this viewpoint. However, the scientific community needs to rethink how it approaches this issue.
The first thing that must come to the mind of any scientist when confronting an issue that is economically significant but statistically insignificant, is the concept of POWER. Lack of power is called “type 2 error” in statistics.
Type 2 error measures the probability of “failure to reject the null hypothesis,” given the alternative hypothesis is true. In the case of global warming, "lack of power" is the error related to the failure to reject the null hypothesis that “no relationship between human action and global warming exists," if the alternative hypothesis that "human action is causing global warming" is true.
Scientists don’t have to prove that human action is causing global warming at 95% level of confidence, even if this can be proven. All they have to do is demonstrate the “lack of power" in the conservative argument. Just because some hypothesis is statistically not significant at 95% level of confidence, does not make that unimportant in an economic sense. And given what is at stake for humanity, the huge economic significance cannot be ignored, even if the effects of global warming are statistically significant only at say 50% level of confidence.
An economically significant event that is statistically insignificant at 95% level of confidence still calls for an effective response. For example, if there is only a 40% chance that one may die after eating food in a restaurant, one would still not eat there, regardless of the fact that the null hypothesis that "the restaurant food does not cause death" cannot be rejected at 95% level of confidence. Economically significant events don’t have to be always statistically significant at 90% or 95% level of confidence for them to deserve an effective response.
The global warming debate is different from debating whether one should devote one's entire life in preparation for not getting hit by lightening. In this case, the probability of being hit by lightening is virtually zero, and so it is unwise to devote significant time and energy to deal with such an occurrence.
I don't think any climate scientist thinks that the probability of the entrapment of greenhouse gases causing severe damage to earth is so small, that no action is warranted. And yet "no action" is the typical recommendation by most conservatives and their think tanks. These conservatives are hiding behind the claim of statistical insignificance, while cleverly evading the type 2 error related to economic significance of the severe damage that can result from entrapment of the greenhouse gases.
The intellectuals are divided as “small selves” on the issue of global warming. The conservative small selves are obsessed with statistical insignificance, while the environmentalist/scientific small selves are obsessed with statistical significance. Both need to come together by focusing on the issue of “lack of power” or the type 2 error to resolve this debate. Just like buying insurance or creating conditions for elimination of terrorism (and not creating more terrorism as being done at present) are right responses for statistically insignificant but economically significant issues, taking concrete steps to significantly reduce greenhouse gases is urgently needed to avoid a potential catastrophe in the making.
The first thing that must come to the mind of any scientist when confronting an issue that is economically significant but statistically insignificant, is the concept of POWER. Lack of power is called “type 2 error” in statistics.
Type 2 error measures the probability of “failure to reject the null hypothesis,” given the alternative hypothesis is true. In the case of global warming, "lack of power" is the error related to the failure to reject the null hypothesis that “no relationship between human action and global warming exists," if the alternative hypothesis that "human action is causing global warming" is true.
Scientists don’t have to prove that human action is causing global warming at 95% level of confidence, even if this can be proven. All they have to do is demonstrate the “lack of power" in the conservative argument. Just because some hypothesis is statistically not significant at 95% level of confidence, does not make that unimportant in an economic sense. And given what is at stake for humanity, the huge economic significance cannot be ignored, even if the effects of global warming are statistically significant only at say 50% level of confidence.
An economically significant event that is statistically insignificant at 95% level of confidence still calls for an effective response. For example, if there is only a 40% chance that one may die after eating food in a restaurant, one would still not eat there, regardless of the fact that the null hypothesis that "the restaurant food does not cause death" cannot be rejected at 95% level of confidence. Economically significant events don’t have to be always statistically significant at 90% or 95% level of confidence for them to deserve an effective response.
The global warming debate is different from debating whether one should devote one's entire life in preparation for not getting hit by lightening. In this case, the probability of being hit by lightening is virtually zero, and so it is unwise to devote significant time and energy to deal with such an occurrence.
I don't think any climate scientist thinks that the probability of the entrapment of greenhouse gases causing severe damage to earth is so small, that no action is warranted. And yet "no action" is the typical recommendation by most conservatives and their think tanks. These conservatives are hiding behind the claim of statistical insignificance, while cleverly evading the type 2 error related to economic significance of the severe damage that can result from entrapment of the greenhouse gases.
The intellectuals are divided as “small selves” on the issue of global warming. The conservative small selves are obsessed with statistical insignificance, while the environmentalist/scientific small selves are obsessed with statistical significance. Both need to come together by focusing on the issue of “lack of power” or the type 2 error to resolve this debate. Just like buying insurance or creating conditions for elimination of terrorism (and not creating more terrorism as being done at present) are right responses for statistically insignificant but economically significant issues, taking concrete steps to significantly reduce greenhouse gases is urgently needed to avoid a potential catastrophe in the making.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)